I tried to come up with a more creative title for this post than simply a list of the topics, but I couldn’t. Sigh. Anyways. Last week I had the chance to go see the outstanding new movie, Star Trek. It was quite the two hour experience.
As I sat there, watching the story of how the way things are in Star Trek came to be, I was particularly struck by the focus they placed on exploring Spock and his logic versus Kirk and his emotionality.
Kirk is a vulnerable character, easily prone to outbursts of anger, running around with bravado and a level of gung-ho perhaps not advisable for the ordinary joe who exists outside of the world of the silver screen. He has a particular fondness for hanging off of things. He’s very sure of himself, arrogant for sure.
Spock, on the other hand, is making every attempt to be what Kirk is not. He wishes to quell his human side, and become a pure mathematical machine. For the most part, he is successful. His father tells him: "I married your mother because it was logical." Spock wants to be just like his father. So he does.
As the film goes along, though, if you’re watching for it, an interesting trend develops with the two main characters. They’re both making nearly all of their decisions based on their emotions, many of which are anger and jealousy. But even though Spock is the most successful in his life, having distinguished himself as one of the more promising young cadets in the Starfleet, you begin to get the distinct feeling that it is Kirk who is destined for long term success. Kirk’s decisions keep working out, and Spock’s keep showing him to be less than what he claims to be.
Why is this? I think it’s how they both were framing their decisions. To Spock, the world must fit into one big logical puzzle, devoid of emotion or feeling, other than perhaps the feeling of fear. What is unfathomable to him, such as someone being able to outsmart him, is rejected as not only illogical, but wrong. If it does not fit into his logical puzzle of the world, then it must be emotion and therefore illogical and therefore wrong. This leads him to incredible rage and anger, which he tries to justify as logical. It’s obvious to everyone that it’s not.
Kirk is the exact opposite in two ways. One, he’s not afraid to let people know exactly what he thinks and feels about them and the situations he’s been presented with. Unlike Spock, he’s not trying to fool everyone into thinking he is logical, he’s just who he is. Secondly, he’s not trying to force the entire universe into his box. He’s accepted the fact that he doesn’t understand everything. But he also comes to the point of realizing he doesn’t have to back down from anything either. He just has to face the obstacles he’s given, albeit perhaps with a bit of overconfidence, and defeat them.
What Kirk may not realize he knows, but he does know, is that the emotions he feels ARE in fact based on logic. It’s subconscious logic that our body tells us. In real life, God has simply given our brains and souls the ability to process what is happening around us in a logical fashion. When we try to force everything into our box of the way the world works, try to force ourselves to be logical, we fail. God hasn’t designed the world to be that way. He wants us to feel. He doesn’t want us making our decisions based on our logic of the world.
We’re not robots. We can’t expect ourselves to act like them. We have feeling. God put it there.